Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs ATI Radeon E2400

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs ATI Radeon E2400

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 and 128MB VRAM Radeon E2400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock937MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (56.06GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
600 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 25W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX350 +2397%
1.199 TFLOPS
Radeon E2400
0.048 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2020
Release Date
Jun 2007
GeForce MX
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

747 MHz
Base Clock
-
937 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
56.06GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
5
SM Count
-
640
Shading Units
40
32
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
29.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
18.74 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1199 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
48.00 GFLOPS
37.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

20W
TDP
25W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
RV610
GP107-670-A1 (N17S-G5-A1)
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy