Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

NVIDIA GeForce2 Ultra vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 64MB VRAM GeForce2 Ultra and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
Released 15 years late
More VRAM (4GB vs 64GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 7.360GB/s)
4096 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2000
Release Date
Aug 2015
GeForce 2
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
AGP 4x
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
230 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

64MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
7.360GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
4096
8
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
175W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x VGA
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

NV15
GPU Name
Fiji
GeForce2 Ultra
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
Celsius
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
180 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.025 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
88 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

7.0
DirectX
12 (12_0)
1.5
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
-
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy