Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550

NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q and 128GB VRAM Data Center GPU Max 1550 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K160Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (130W vs 600W)
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1600MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
16192 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Max 1550 +15982%
52.43 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Jan 2023
GRID
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1600 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
128GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
16384
16
TMUs
1024
16
ROPs
0
-
Tensor Cores
1024
-
RT Cores
128
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per EU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
408 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1638 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
52.43 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
52.43 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.43 TFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
600W
300 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
Ponte Vecchio
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
100 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
1280 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy