NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM GRID M10 8Q and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1306MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (83.20GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID M10 8Q
+261%
1.672 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2016
Release Date
Nov 2008
GRID
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1033 MHz
Base Clock
-
1306 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
640
Shading Units
192
40
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.90 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
52.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.672 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
52.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GT200B
GM107-570-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
