Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
464 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 65W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.14GB/s vs 34.14GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Jetson Orin Nano 4 GB +403%
0.64 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2023
Release Date
Aug 2008
Tegra
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1067 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
LPDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
34.14GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
6
512
Shading Units
48
16
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
16
16
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
1280 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
640.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
320.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

10W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GA10B
GPU Name
G94
-
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
Unknown
Transistors
0.505 billion
Unknown
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy