Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD FirePro R5000

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs AMD FirePro R5000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 2GB VRAM FirePro R5000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 150W)
AMD FirePro R5000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (102.4GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
752 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
FirePro R5000 +3148%
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Feb 2013
NVS
Generation
FirePro Remote
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
32 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

18W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
Pitcairn
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy