Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA NVS 300 vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 300 and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (18W vs 130W)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
6128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 300
0.039 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +68438%
26.73 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2011
Release Date
Aug 2023
NVS
Generation
Quadro Ada(x000A)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
20GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
160bit
12.64GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
48
16
Shading Units
6144
8
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.080 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
174.0 GPixel/s
4.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
39.36 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

18W
TDP
130W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
AD104
GT218-670-B1
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
8.9
4.1
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy