Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 310 vs ATI FirePro V3700

NVIDIA NVS 310 vs ATI FirePro V3700

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM NVS 310 and 256MB VRAM FirePro V3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (512GB vs 256GB)
8 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 32W)
ATI FirePro V3700 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (15.20GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 310 +56%
0.1 TFLOPS
FirePro V3700
0.064 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Aug 2008
NVS
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
875 MHz
Memory Clock
950 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
14.00GB/s
Bandwidth
15.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
1
SM Count
-
48
Shading Units
40
8
TMUs
4
4
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.046 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.200 GPixel/s
4.184 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
100.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
64.00 GFLOPS
8.368 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

20W
TDP
32W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DisplayPort
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF119
GPU Name
RV620
GF119-825-A1
GPU Variant
RV620 GL (215-0670004)
Fermi 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
79 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
N/A
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
2.1
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy