Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA NVS 510 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

NVIDIA NVS 510 vs AMD Radeon R9 FURY X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM NVS 510 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 FURY X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA NVS 510 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 275W)
AMD Radeon R9 FURY X 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
3904 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
NVS 510
0.306 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 FURY X +2711%
8.602 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2012
Release Date
Jun 2015
NVS
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
4096
16
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.188 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
67.20 GPixel/s
12.75 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
268.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.602 TFLOPS
306.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.602 TFLOPS
12.75 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
537.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
275W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
Fiji
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
Fiji XT C8 (215-0862040)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy