Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000 and 2GB VRAM Quadro M520 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro 2000 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (41.60GB/s vs 40.10GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro M520 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (25W vs 62W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro 2000
0.48 TFLOPS
Quadro M520 Mobile +66%
0.8 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2010
Release Date
Jan 2017
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
650 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
41.60GB/s
Bandwidth
40.10GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.328 GPixel/s
20.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.66 GTexel/s
-
-
-
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
799.5 GFLOPS
40.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.98 GFLOPS

Board Design

62W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GF106
GPU Name
GM108
GF106-875-KA-A1
GPU Variant
-
Fermi
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.17 billion
Transistors
Unknown
238 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
2.1
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy