Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M vs NVIDIA Quadro P4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1600M and 8GB VRAM Quadro P4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1600M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 105W)
NVIDIA Quadro P4000 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (243.3GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1760 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1600M
0.08 TFLOPS
Quadro P4000 +6530%
5.304 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-HE
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1202 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1901 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
243.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
14
32
Shading Units
1792
16
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
94.72 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
165.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
82.88 GFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.304 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
165.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
105W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
GP104
NB8P-GLM
GPU Variant
GP104-850-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy