Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
14048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700
0.059 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250X +81035%
47.87 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2007
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
128GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
220
4
SM Count
-
32
Shading Units
14080
16
TMUs
880
8
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.680 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
7.360 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
383.0 TFLOPS
58.88 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.87 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
47.87 TFLOPS

Board Design

42W
TDP
500W
200 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
Aldebaran
G84-875-A2
GPU Variant
Aldebaran XT
Tesla
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy