Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA L40S

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M vs NVIDIA L40S

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700M and 48GB VRAM L40S to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 300W)
NVIDIA L40S 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
18144 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 1700M
0.099 TFLOPS
L40S +92435%
91.61 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2008
Release Date
Oct 2022
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla Ada
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-II
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1110 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
142
32
Shading Units
18176
16
TMUs
568
8
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
483.8 GPixel/s
10.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1431 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.61 TFLOPS
99.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.61 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1431 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
AD102
NB9P-GLM
GPU Variant
AD102-???-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy