Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs Intel Arctic Sound M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP vs Intel Arctic Sound M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 LP and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
8184 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 370 LP
0.017 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M +86664%
14.75 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
8.000GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
-
8
Shading Units
8192
4
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.160 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
2.160 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
17.28 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
500W
200 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
-
-
Tesla
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy