Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 75W)
Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1008 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140 +8977%
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
32 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
4.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
44.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
-
-
-

Board Design

28W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
DG2-128
GT218 GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy