Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs AMD Instinct MI300X

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs AMD Instinct MI300X

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 192GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 750W)
AMD Instinct MI300X 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
19264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300X +35267%
163.4 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro FX
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3
256bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
304
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
19456
64
TMUs
880
16
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1300 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
163.4 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
81.7 TFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
750W
300 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
MI300
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
146 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy