Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1536GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (51W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D +58%
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
32
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
192 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
51W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy