Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA Quadro K6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 and 12GB VRAM Quadro K6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Quadro K6000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro K6000 +1024%
5.196 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jul 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
797 MHz
-
Boost Clock
902 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
288.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
2880
64
TMUs
240
24
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
192 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.12 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
216.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.196 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1.732 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GK110B
-
GPU Variant
GK110-890-B1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.3
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy