Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 5600 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 5600
0.346 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000M +521%
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2007
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
345.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

171W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
GM204
G80-875-A2
GPU Variant
N16E-Q1-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy