Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs AMD Instinct MI300A

NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs AMD Instinct MI300A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 760W)
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
14400 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300A +37507%
122.6 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
128GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM3
64bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
228
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
14592
16
TMUs
880
8
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
980.6 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
122.6 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
61.3 TFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
760W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
MI300
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
146 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy