Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Quadro 7000

NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Quadro 7000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 6GB VRAM Quadro 7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 204W)
NVIDIA Quadro 7000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (163.4GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro 7000 +308%
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
May 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
851 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
163.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
192
Shading Units
512
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
18.23 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
204W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GF110
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy