Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
160 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 42W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (20.80GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M +386%
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
192
Shading Units
32
16
TMUs
16
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
42W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
G84
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy