Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

NVIDIA Quadro K5000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000M and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K5000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 5 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K5000M +249%
1.615 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Mar 2009
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
96.00GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
1344
Shading Units
192
112
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.83 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.600 GPixel/s
67.31 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.615 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
67.31 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

100W
TDP
108W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GT200B
N14E-Q5-A2
GPU Variant
G200-835-B2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy