Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3700 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
656 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 78W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2000 +537%
1.786 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3700
0.28 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2016
Release Date
Jan 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

796 MHz
Base Clock
-
1163 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
768
Shading Units
112
48
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.22 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
55.82 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
28.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.786 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
280.0 GFLOPS
55.82 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
78W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
G92
GM206-875-A1
GPU Variant
G92-875-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy