Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro M2200 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro K1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1036MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (88.13GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro M2200 Mobile +550%
2.122 TFLOPS
Quadro K1000M
0.326 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro M2200 Mobile +266%
77
Quadro K1000M
21
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2017
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

695 MHz
Base Clock
-
1036 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1377 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
88.13GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
192
64
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

33.15 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
66.30 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.122 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
66.30 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
45W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
N14P-Q1-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy