Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 130M and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 247W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2075 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (150.3GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
440 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 130M
0.013 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075 +7807%
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2007
Release Date
Jul 2011
NVS Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
700 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
14
8
Shading Units
448
8
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
3.200 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
12.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
247W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G86
GPU Name
GF110
G86-613-A2
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
3 billion
127 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.1
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy