Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M vs NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 160M and 16GB VRAM Quadro P5200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro NVS 160M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (12W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1569MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (230.9GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
2552 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro NVS 160M
0.023 TFLOPS
Quadro P5200 Max Q +34826%
8.033 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2008
Release Date
Feb 2018
NVS Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-I
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1316 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1569 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1804 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
11.20GB/s
Bandwidth
230.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
1
SM Count
20
8
Shading Units
2560
4
TMUs
160
4
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
16 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.320 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
100.4 GPixel/s
2.320 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
251.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
125.5 GFLOPS
23.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.033 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
251.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

12W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G98
GPU Name
GP104
NB9M-GS
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
16 nm
0.21 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
86 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy