Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile and 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1543MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Mobile +1210%
5.53 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000M
0.422 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Jan 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1328 MHz
Base Clock
-
1543 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
128bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
4
1792
Shading Units
192
112
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.75 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
86.41 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.530 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
172.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
N12P-Q3
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy