Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile and 8GB VRAM Quadro M5500 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 32% (1543MHz vs 1165MHz)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro M5500 Mobile 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.4GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Mobile +15%
5.53 TFLOPS
Quadro M5500 Mobile
4.772 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1328 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
1543 MHz
Boost Clock
1165 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
224.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
-
1792
Shading Units
2048
112
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.75 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.56 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
149.1 GTexel/s
86.41 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.530 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.772 TFLOPS
172.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
149.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
150W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GM204
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
5.2
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy