Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla C2075

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2075 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1543MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 150.3GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 247W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P3200 Mobile +437%
5.53 TFLOPS
Tesla C2075
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2018
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1328 MHz
Base Clock
-
1543 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
783 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
384bit
168.3GB/s
Bandwidth
150.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
14
SM Count
14
1792
Shading Units
448
112
TMUs
56
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

98.75 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
172.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
86.41 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.530 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
172.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
247W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
GF110-351-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy