Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro P5000 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090

NVIDIA Quadro P5000 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM Quadro P5000 and 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P5000 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1733MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 6GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.5GB/s vs 177.4GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (180W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro P5000 +566%
8.873 TFLOPS
Tesla M2090
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2016
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1607 MHz
Base Clock
-
1733 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1127 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5X
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
288.5GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
20
SM Count
16
2560
Shading Units
512
160
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

110.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
277.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
138.6 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
8.873 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
277.3 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

180W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GP104
GPU Name
GF110
GP104-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
16 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.2 billion
Transistors
3 billion
314 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy