Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA Quadro 410

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh vs NVIDIA Quadro 410

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh and 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh +1855%
5.299 TFLOPS
Quadro 410
0.271 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2019
Release Date
Aug 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

945 MHz
Base Clock
-
1380 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.26GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
-
1920
Shading Units
192
120
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

88.32 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.824 GPixel/s
165.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.30 GTexel/s
10.60 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.299 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
271.1 GFLOPS
165.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
11.30 GFLOPS

Board Design

80W
TDP
38W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
GK107
N19E-Q1-KD-A1
GPU Variant
GK107-810-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy