Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon 680M vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

AMD Radeon 680M vs NVIDIA CMP 30HX

We compared a Integrated graphics card GPU: 0System Shared VRAM Radeon 680M and a Desktop platform GPU: 6GB VRAM CMP 30HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon 680M 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 23% (2200MHz vs 1785MHz)
Lower TDP (50W vs 125W)
NVIDIA CMP 30HX 's Advantages
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon 680M
3.379 TFLOPS
CMP 30HX +48%
5.027 TFLOPS
Blender
Radeon 680M
244
CMP 30HX +228%
801
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Feb 2021
Navi II IGP
Generation
Mining GPUs
Integrated
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

2000 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
2200 MHz
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
6GB
System Shared
Memory Type
GDDR6
System Shared
Memory Bus
192bit
System Dependent
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
768
Shading Units
1408
48
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
48
-
-
-
12
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

70.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
85.68 GPixel/s
105.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.1 GTexel/s
6.758 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
10.05 TFLOPS
3.379 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.027 TFLOPS
211.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

50W
TDP
125W
-
Suggested PSU
300 W
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Rembrandt
GPU Name
TU116
-
GPU Variant
TU116-100-A1
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
12 nm
13.1 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
208 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy