Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon HD 4250 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

ATI Radeon HD 4250 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4250 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon HD 4250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 6.336GB/s)
4440 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon HD 4250
0.048 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX +26212%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2009
Release Date
Sep 2021
Radeon R600
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
396 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR2
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
6.336GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
70
40
Shading Units
4480
4
TMUs
280
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.376 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
2.376 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
47.52 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
GA100
RV620 LE
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
4.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy