Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 64GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI210 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI210 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (64GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1638GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
6528 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 300W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI210 +5262%
22.63 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3800M
0.422 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2021
Release Date
Aug 2008
Radeon Instinct
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

64GB
Memory Size
1024MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR3
4096bit
Memory Bus
256bit
1638GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

104
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
6656
Shading Units
128
416
TMUs
64
0
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
16 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
707.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.20 GTexel/s
181.0 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
22.63 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
22.63 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

300W
TDP
100W
700 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
G92
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM3-B2
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
65 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
Unknown
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy