Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA GRID M6 8Q

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 vs NVIDIA GRID M6 8Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 and 8GB VRAM GRID M6 8Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 8GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
11776 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GRID M6 8Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 500W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Instinct MI250 +1940%
45.26 TFLOPS
GRID M6 8Q
2.218 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2021
Release Date
Aug 2015
Radeon Instinct
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1700 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1600 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

128GB
Memory Size
8GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5
8192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
3277GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

208
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
13312
Shading Units
1536
832
TMUs
96
0
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
16 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

0 MPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.21 GPixel/s
1414 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
69.31 GTexel/s
362.1 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
45.26 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.218 TFLOPS
45.26 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
69.31 GFLOPS

Board Design

500W
TDP
100W
900 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Aldebaran
GPU Name
GM204
Aldebaran
GPU Variant
GM204-995-A1
CDNA 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
6 nm
Process Size
28 nm
58.2 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
Unknown
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
N/A
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy