Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI FirePro V9800

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris vs ATI FirePro V9800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris and 4GB VRAM FirePro V9800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris +110%
5.728 TFLOPS
FirePro V9800
2.72 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2017
Release Date
Sep 2010
Radeon Pro GCN
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

16GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

36
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
1600
144
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.20 GPixel/s
179.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
68.00 GTexel/s
5.728 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.728 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.720 TFLOPS
358.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
544.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
250W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
Cypress
Ellesmere Gemini GL
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy