Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 430

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6800 and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 430 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2320MHz
More VRAM (32GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
3744 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 's Advantages
Lower TDP (49W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon Pro W6800 +6524%
17.82 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 430
0.269 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2021
Release Date
Oct 2010
Radeon Pro
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

2075 MHz
Base Clock
-
2320 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

32GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
512.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

60
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
3840
Shading Units
96
240
TMUs
16
96
ROPs
4
-
-
-
60
RT Cores
-
128 KB per Array
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
128 MB
L3 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

222.7 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
556.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.20 GTexel/s
35.64 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
17.82 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
268.8 GFLOPS
1114 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
22.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
49W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Navi 21
GPU Name
GF108
-
GPU Variant
GF108-300-A1
RDNA 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
40 nm
26.8 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
520 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy