Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R7 240 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000

AMD Radeon R7 240 vs NVIDIA RTX A1000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 and 8GB VRAM RTX A1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 50W)
NVIDIA RTX A1000 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 87% (1462MHz vs 780MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1984 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 +1250%
6.737 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Apr 2024
Volcanic Islands
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

730 MHz
Base Clock
727 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
1462 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

5
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
18
320
Shading Units
2304
20
TMUs
72
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
72
-
RT Cores
18
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

6.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
46.78 GPixel/s
15.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
105.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.737 TFLOPS
499.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.737 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
105.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Oland
GPU Name
GA107
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy