Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 380 OEM vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

AMD Radeon R9 380 OEM vs AMD Radeon PRO W6300

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 380 OEM and 2GB VRAM Radeon PRO W6300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 380 OEM 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon PRO W6300 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock2040MHz
Lower TDP (25W vs 190W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 380 OEM +5%
3.29 TFLOPS
Radeon PRO W6300
3.133 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Jan 2022
Pirate Islands
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1512 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2040 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
32bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

29.38 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.28 GPixel/s
102.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.92 GTexel/s
3.290 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.267 TFLOPS
3.290 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.133 TFLOPS
205.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
195.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

190W
TDP
25W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Antigua
GPU Name
Navi 24
Antigua PRO (215-0877000)
GPU Variant
Navi 24
GCN 3.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
5 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy