Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1266MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
512 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (95W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon R9 M395 Mac Edition
2.989 TFLOPS
Radeon E9550 MXM +95%
5.834 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2015
Release Date
Sep 2016
Crystal System
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1120 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1266 MHz
1365 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
174.7GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
2304
112
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

26.69 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.51 GPixel/s
93.41 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
182.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.834 TFLOPS
2.989 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.834 TFLOPS
373.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
364.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
95W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Amethyst
GPU Name
Ellesmere
Amethyst PRO (216-0872004)
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
5 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy