Home GPU Comparison AMD Radeon RX 560 XT vs AMD FireStream 9270

AMD Radeon RX 560 XT vs AMD FireStream 9270

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM Radeon RX 560 XT and 2GB VRAM FireStream 9270 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon RX 560 XT 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1226MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
992 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Radeon RX 560 XT +266%
4.394 TFLOPS
FireStream 9270
1.2 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2019
Release Date
Nov 2008
Polaris
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1074 MHz
Base Clock
-
1226 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
224.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
800
112
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.23 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.00 GPixel/s
137.3 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.00 GTexel/s
4.394 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.394 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1200 GFLOPS
274.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
240.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
160W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Ellesmere
GPU Name
RV770
Polaris 10 LE1
GPU Variant
RV770 XT
GCN 4.0
Architecture
TeraScale
GlobalFoundries
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
5.7 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
232 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy