Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1600 vs AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM

ATI Radeon X1600 vs AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM

ATI Radeon X1600
VS
AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM
ATI Radeon X1600
AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM Radeon X1600 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (27W vs 50W)
AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock780MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Nov 2013
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
730 MHz
-
Boost Clock
780 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR2
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
320
4
TMUs
20
4
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
31.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

27W
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Oland
-
-
-
R500
Architecture
GCN 1.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy