Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 GTO vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

ATI Radeon X1650 GTO vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 GTO and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
More VRAM (896GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 12.54GB/s)
216 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2007
Release Date
Nov 2008
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
392 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
896MB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
12.54GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
27
-
Shading Units
216
4
TMUs
72
4
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.348 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
2.348 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
171W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 1x VGA
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV530
GPU Name
GT200B
RV530 LE
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.157 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
150 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
2.1
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.3
3.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy