Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1650 vs AMD FirePro W8000

ATI Radeon X1650 vs AMD FirePro W8000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W8000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W8000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1792
4
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.540 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
2.540 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Ultra-Threaded SE
Architecture
GCN 1.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.105 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy