Home GPU Comparison ATI Radeon X1700 FSC vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

ATI Radeon X1700 FSC vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM Radeon X1700 FSC and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI Radeon X1700 FSC 's Advantages
Lower TDP (44W vs 75W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 GDDR6 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1590MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 22.24GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2007
Release Date
Apr 2020
Radeon R500 PCIe
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1410 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
695 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
22.24GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
-
Shading Units
896
4
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.348 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
2.348 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

44W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV535
GPU Name
TU117
RV535 FSC
GPU Variant
TU117-300-A1
R500
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.33 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
131 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
3.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy