NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation and 16GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Lower TDP (70W vs 285W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 23% (2610MHz vs 2130MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.3GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
5632 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Ada Generation
12 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102
+267%
44.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Jun 2024
Quadro Ada
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1620 MHz
Base Clock
2340 MHz
2130 MHz
Boost Clock
2610 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6X
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
672.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
22
SM Count
66
2816
Shading Units
8448
88
TMUs
264
48
ROPs
96
88
Tensor Cores
264
22
RT Cores
66
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
102.2 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
250.6 GPixel/s
187.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
689.0 GTexel/s
12.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
44.10 TFLOPS
12.00 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.10 TFLOPS
187.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
689.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
70W
TDP
285W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
AD102
-
GPU Variant
AD102-175-KEF-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
5 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.8
