NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 31% (2010MHz vs 1530MHz)
896 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 175W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 256.0GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation
+85%
12.35 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile
6.659 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2023
Release Date
Jul 2019
Quadro Ada-M
Generation
GeForce 20 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1530 MHz
Base Clock
1470 MHz
2010 MHz
Boost Clock
1530 MHz
2000 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
256.0GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
34
3072
Shading Units
2176
96
TMUs
136
48
ROPs
64
96
Tensor Cores
272
24
RT Cores
34
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
12 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
96.48 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
97.92 GPixel/s
193.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
208.1 GTexel/s
12.35 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
13.32 TFLOPS
12.35 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.659 TFLOPS
193.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
208.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
175W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
AD107
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
TU106-410-A1
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
12 nm
18.9 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
159 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.9
CUDA
7.5
6.7
Shader Model
6.7
