Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs ATI Radeon HD 3850 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 3850 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2175MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 52.99GB/s)
5824 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 140W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +6145%
26.73 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 3850 X2
0.428 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2023
Release Date
Apr 2008
Quadro Ada(x000A)
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1500 MHz
Base Clock
-
2175 MHz
Boost Clock
-
2250 MHz
Memory Clock
828 MHz

Memory

20GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
160bit
Memory Bus
256bit
360.0GB/s
Bandwidth
52.99GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
4
48
SM Count
-
6144
Shading Units
320
192
TMUs
16
80
ROPs
16
192
Tensor Cores
-
48
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

174.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.70 GPixel/s
417.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.70 GTexel/s
26.73 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
26.73 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
428.2 GFLOPS
417.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
85.63 GFLOPS

Board Design

130W
TDP
140W
300 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 16-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

AD104
GPU Name
RV670
-
GPU Variant
RV670 PRO (215-0708003)
Ada Lovelace
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
5 nm
Process Size
55 nm
35.8 billion
Transistors
0.666 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
192 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.9
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy