Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP

NVIDIA RTX A2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 6GB VRAM RTX A2000 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370 LP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A2000 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
3320 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
RTX A2000 +46882%
7.987 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 370 LP
0.017 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2021
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Ampere
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

562 MHz
Base Clock
-
1200 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR2
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
26
SM Count
1
3328
Shading Units
8
104
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
104
Tensor Cores
-
26
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

57.60 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
124.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
7.987 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.987 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.28 GFLOPS
124.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

70W
TDP
25W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA106
GPU Name
G98
GA106-850-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
12 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
276 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy